Petitioner's counsel stated the writ petition was withdrawn. The High Court dismissed the petition accordingly.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.13633 of 2012 Date of decision:20.09.2012
Anand Parkash
.....Petitioner
Versus
ICICI Bank & others
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Ms.J.J.Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner,
Mr.R.M.Suri, Advocate, for respondent No.1-Bank.
Ajay Kumar Mittal J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition may
be dismissed as withdrawn.
Ordered accordingly.
(Ajay Kumar Mittal) JUDGE 20.09.2012 (G.S.Sandhawalia) sailesh JUDGE
Anand Parkash
ICICI Bank
Ajay Kumar Mittal
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
