Dismissed
Rimpy Bala & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/7689/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-7689 of 2011 Date of decision:-04.5.2011
Rimpy Bala and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:Ms. Rohini Bedi, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Guninder S. Brar, AAG Punjab.
RITU BAHRI J.(Oral)
This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for directing respondent Nos.1 to 3 for providing adequate security and protection to the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent No.4 and further not to harass and interfere in the peaceful married life of the petitioners.
Counsel for the State on instructions from HC Kuldeep Singh informs the Court that the petitioners have made statements before the police that they do not apprehend any threat from respondent No.4-Smt. Kiran Bala Ghai, mother of petitioner No.1 and do not require any protection.
In view of this fact, no further orders are required to be passed in this criminal miscellaneous petition.
In case the petitioners need any protection, they can approach before the authorities as per the instructions dated 10.8.2010 issued by the Home Department, Punjab.
The criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly.
May 04, 2011 Vijay Asija
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition for protection under Section 482 Cr.P.C. requires further orders given the petitioners' statement of non-apprehension.
Whether reference to Home Department instructions satisfies the requirement to dispose of the petition.
Rimmy Bala and another
State of Punjab and others
RITU BAHRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court