Criminal Misc. Petition seeking security orders and protection from harassment. Court disposed of the petition as respondents had no objection to the marriage, directing petitioners to approach authorities if needed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M- 4747 of 2011 Date of decision:-04.5.2011
Jyoti and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:Mr. J.S. Hooda, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.S. Virk, DAG Haryana for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr. Ashok Kaushik, Advocate for respondent Nos.4 to 8.
RITU BAHRI J.(Oral)
This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for directing respondent Nos.1 and 2 for providing adequate security and protection to the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent Nos.3 to 8 and further not to harass and interfere in the peaceful married life of the petitioners.
Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.4 to 8 states that these respondents have no objection to the marriage of the petitioners.
In view of the statement of counsel for respondent Nos.4 to 8, no further orders are required to be passed in this criminal miscellaneous petition.
In case the petitioners need any protection, they can approach before the authorities as per the instructions dated 21.2.2011 issued by the Home Department, Haryana.
The criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly.
May 04, 2011 Vijay Asija
Jyoti and another
State of Haryana
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
