Avnish Tyagi Vs HUDA and Ors.

In this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to count his adhoc service period from 4.7.1994 to 30.9.2003 for seniority and grant him seniority in the cadre of Junior Engineers w.e.f. 4.7.1994 and all consequential benefits arising therefrom.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made a representation dated 5.5.2009 (Annexure P-5) to respondent No.1 for the same relief as claimed in this writ petition but no action has been taken thereon so far and he shall feel satisfied if a direction is issued to him to decide the same in a given time frame.

¶14

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the file, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to decide the representation (Annexure P-5) sent by the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order by passing a speaking order and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

¶15

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE

¶16

April 23, 2010 gbs

Avnish Tyagi v. HUDA and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Avnish Tyagi v. HUDA and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harjinder Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Dalbir Singh and Ors. Vs P.R.T.C. and Anr.

Ekam Singh Vs State of Haryana etc.

Narinder Kumar Vs P.R.T.C. & Others

Rajender Kumar & Ors. Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Hardeep Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.