Ashok Kumar and Anr. Vs State of Haryana

Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.110 dated 23.8.2009, under Sections 148,149,323,324,379,427,452,307,506 and 120-B of Indian Penal Code, Police Station Mullana, District Ambala.

¶17

At the time of issuance of notice of motion on 10.5.2010, the following order was passed by this Court :-

¶18

"Notice of motion for 22.7.2010.

¶19

In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the

¶20

petitioners be admitted to interim bail subject to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. They shall abide by the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) of

¶21

Crl. Misc. No. M- 13324 of 2010

¶22

2

¶23

the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶24

List along with CRM-M No.13100 of 2010”

¶25

Learned State counsel, who is assisted by ASI Mahal Singh and the learned counsel for the complainant, has submitted that in terms of the order passed by this Court petitioners have joined the investigation.

¶26

Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the interim bail granted by this Court vide order dated 10.5.2010 is made absolute.

¶27

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

¶28

(SABINA) September 9, 2010 JUDGE Anand

Ashok Kumar and Anr. v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Kumar and Anr. v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vs

Lalit Syal and Others Vs State of Haryana and Another

Sukhbir Sharma Vs State of Haryana

Gaganpreet Singh Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Ajit Walia and Ors. Vs State of Haryana

Rajesh Kumar and Ors. Vs State of Haryana