Dismissed
Lalit Syal and Others v. State of Haryana and Another
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/13133/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M- 13133 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 8, 2010
Lalit Syal and others
........Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and another
........Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. V.B. Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Satyavir Singh Yadav, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. K.P.S. Dhillon, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
SABINA, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition to enable the petitioners to take up all the pleas available to them during trial.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
However, the personal appearance of petitioners No.2 and 4 before the trial Court is exempted subject to the following conditions :-
(i) Petitioners shall be represented through counsel; (ii) shall not delay/stall the trial proceedings; (iii) shall not dispute their identity as an accused;
(iv) shall have no objection if the prosecution evidence is recorded in their absence but in the presence of his counsel; (v) shall appear before the trial Court as and when required by the trial Court; and (vi) any other condition which the learned trial Court may impose
(SABINA) JUDGE
September 8, 2010 Anand
Lalit Syal and others
State of Haryana and another
SABINA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court