Allowed

Sunil Rauniyar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC6 Jun 2013CR. MISC./18039/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted provisional bail to the petitioner facing charges under Sections 498A and related provisions. The grant is contingent upon the petitioner filing an undertaking within four weeks to continue the matrimonial relationship and attempting dispute resolution in the court below.

What did the court decide?

Provisional bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, conditional on filing undertaking and resolving dispute.

Sunil Rauniyar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.18039 of 2013

¶2

====================================================== Sunil Rauniyar S/O Suresh Rauniyar R/O Village - Moh. Takurbari, P.S. Motihari Town, District - East Champaran .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Mohini Roniyar W/O Sunil Roniyar, D/O Chandra Shekhar Gupta R/O Village - Baniya Patti, P.S. Motihari Town, District - East Champaran .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶3

06.06.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner-husband is apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Section 498A, 323, 379/34 of the Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted on his behalf that notwithstanding the First Information Report he is ready and willing to continue the matrimonial relationship with the informant and to that effect he shall file a written undertaking on affidavit in the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in the court below. No sooner the petitioner surrenders in the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in the court below and files such affidavit, he, named above, be admitted to the privilege of provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Town (Motihari) P.S. Case No. 124/2012 and thereafter the informant be noticed and after she appears

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18039 of 2013 (3) dt.06-06-2013

¶5

¶6

in the court below, in presence of the court, petitioner shall make all possible efforts for resolution of the matrimonial dispute between him and the informant not only by words of mouth but also by his suitable conduct and gesture. In the event court below is satisfied that dispute is resolved or the informant is back in her matrimonial home and matrimonial peace prevails in the family or she is found to be unreasonable, provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed, failing which court below shall be at liberty to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law considering the reasonableness of the stand of the parties including order cancelling the order granting provisional bail to the petitioner.

¶7

This application is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶8

Let this order be communicated to the court below through

¶9

fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioner.

¶10

(V.N.Sinha,J.)

¶11

P.K.P.

Sunil Rauniyar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Rauniyar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudesh Yadav @ Sudesh Kr. Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Parwezullah Vs The State Of Bihar

Ravi Shankar Rai @ Munna Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Rohit Kumar Singh @ Rohit Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Bathu Prasad @ Batahu Bhagat Vs The State Of Bihar

Nagina Roy Yadav @ Nagina Roy and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar