Disposed

Prakash Ku.Ray v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC4 Oct 2016WP(C)/16898/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a writ petition concerning the reassignment of village Parsurampur from Grama Panchayat Krushnadaspur to Arilo after bifurcation. It stayed the exclusion notification and directed the Commissioner to consider the petitioner's representation.

What did the court decide?

Stay on notification excluding Parsurampur from Krushnadaspur Grama Panchayat; directive to Commissioner to consider grievance within six weeks with hearing opportunity.

Prakash Ku.Ray Vs State of Odisha — Municipal and Town Planning | Orissa HC (2016)

¶1

 W.P.(C). NO. 16898 of 2016

¶2

02. 04.10.2016 Heard.

¶3

 The petitioner is a villager of Village Parsurampur, which was under the juris
diction of the old Grama Panchayat named Krushnadaspur in the district of Jagatsinghpur. On bi
furcation of village Krushnadaspur, a new Grama Panchayat named Arilo has been created and the
 petitioners Village Parsurampur has been brought under Arilo Grama Panchayat. The petitioner,
 on the ground of proximity, administrative convenience etc. wants that, his village Parsuramp
ur should continue to remain under the jurisdiction of old Grama Panchayat Krushnadaspur.
 Taking into consideration the limited grievance of the petitioner and without
going into merit of the case, the writ application is disposed of with a direction that the pe
titioner shall file a detailed representation along with a certified copy of this order and a
copy of the writ application containing all the Annexures before the learned Commissioner-cum-
Secretary to the Government in Panchayati Raj Deptt. within 15 days from today.

¶4

 Learned Commissioner-cum-Secretary, P.R. Department is directed to consider th
e grievance of the petitioner within six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of
 this order. The petitioner and other concerned parties may be given opportunity of hearing in
 the matter and a reasoned order in consonance with the

¶5

 guidelines of the Govt. be passed by Commissioner-cum-Secretary, P.R. Department.
 The Notification vide Annexure- 2 so far as exclusion of Village- Parsurampur
from Krushnadaspur Grama Panchayat is concerned, shall not be given effect to, till disposal o
f the representation of the petitioner by the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, P.R. Department.
 The writ application is accordingly disposed of.
 Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.

¶6

 Subha

¶7

 C.R. Dash, J.

¶8

Prakash Ku.Ray v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prakash Ku.Ray v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Purna Ch.Moharana Vs Collector,Jagatsinghpur

Jaladhara Rana Vs State of Orissa

Udaya Narayan Buruda Vs State of Orissa

Achyuta Mohanty Vs State of Odisha

Kuntabhatta Majhi Vs State of Orissa

Brahmabasi Beura Vs State of Odisha