R.Sreekumar v. Sri.Jacob John
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt of court case, the High Court at Ernakulam admitted the petition on the same day. A Government Pleader submitted that assessment orders passed under Section 19(C) of the KGST Act did not conflict with the impugned judgment. The court closed the contempt case without finding specifics.
What did the court decide?
Contempt of Court case is closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI
MONDAY, THE 13TH OCTOBER 2008 / 21ST ASWINA 1930
Con.Case(C).No. 1290 of 2008(S) ------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.22277/2008 ....................
PETITIONER(S):
R. SREEKUMAR, S/O.LATE K.S. RAJASEKHARAN NAIR, AGED 46, RESIDING AT AZHAKATH PUTHEN VEEDU, KILIKOLLOOR POST, KOLLAM, PIN - 691 004.
BY ADV. SRI.K.P.RAMACHANDRAN
RESPONDENT(S):
SRI. JACOB JOHN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER-IV (ASSESSMENT), COMMERCIAL TAXES, SPECIAL CIRCLE, KOLLAM.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the notice filed by the petitioners is maintainable in view of the pending dismissal of the writ petition.
Whether the assessment orders passed under Section 19(C) of the KGST Act were valid.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R. SREEKUMAR
- respondent
SRI. JACOB JOHN
Coram
V. GIRI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court