Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous petition. The Single Judge allowed the withdrawal with liberty to raise grounds at an appropriate stage, dismissing the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 83 of 2022
Saddam Ansari …… Petitioner
Versus
1.The State of Jharkhand
…… Opposite Parties
---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner : Mr. D.K. Maltiyar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Spl. P.P.
02/Dated: 16/02/2022
Heard Mr. D. K. Maltiyar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ravi Prakash, learned counsel for the State.
This petition has been heard through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been heard.
After some arguments, Mr. D. K. Maltiyar, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to take all the grounds at appropriate stage.
Learned counsel for the State has got no objection.
Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as
withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Satyarthi/
Saddam Ansari
The State of Jharkhand
M/s Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd.
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court