The High Court directed petitioners to appear before the court below by 07.03.2022. If they appear, the process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. shall not be executed. Failure to appear invites coercive measures.
Court stayed execution of Section 82 Cr.P.C. process if petitioners appear by 07.03.2022; otherwise coercive measures may follow.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 228 of 2022
3.Manoranjan Basak
Versus
The State of Jharkhand …… Opposite Party
---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioners : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kumar Tiwari, A.P.P.
02/Dated: 16/02/2022
Heard Mr. Gautam Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and
Mr. Abhay Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the State.
09.11.2021 whereby process under section 82 Cr.P.C. has been issued against the petitioners in connection with Rajmahal P.S. Case No. 303 of 2018, corresponding to G.R. No. 1191 of 2018, pending in the Court of learned SubDivisional Judicial Magistrate, Rajmahal.
2
that there is no illegality in the impugned order.
Satyarthi/
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to quash an order issuing process under section 82 Cr.P.C. given a compromise between parties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Md. Rustum Alam @ Rustam & Ors. Vs. The State of JharkhandReferred¶18
2020 (2) JLJR 712
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravi Basak @ Rabi Basak
Nibha Basak @ Nirmala Basak
Manoranjan Basak
Namita Basak
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court