Amrin Naz v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No.…
What did the court decide?
Permission granted to withdraw the application; application dismissed as withdrawn.
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No.…
Permission granted to withdraw the application; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. M. P. No. 289 of 2020
Amrin Naz @ Amrin Naaz … … Petitioner
Versus
1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Md. Mumtaz Alam @ Laddu … … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party No. 1 : Mr. Someshwar Roy, A.P.P. For the Opposite Party No. 2 : Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate
3/19.03.2021 Mr. Arun Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Mr. Mahesh Tewari, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has no objection.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)
R. Shekhar Cp 3
Amrin Naz @ Amrin Naaz
The State of Jharkhand
Md. Mumtaz Alam @ Laddu
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court