Petitioner in Criminal Revision No. 739 of 2016 sought to withdraw the revision challenging a maintenance order. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the revision accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the criminal revision petition granted and revision dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Revision No. 739 of 2016
Chetlal Goswami, son of Janki Goswami, resident of village Balidih, Goswami Tola, PO and PS-Balidih, District-Bokaro
... ... Petitioner
Versus
At present all are residents of village Jaina More, Tand Mohanpur Side, PO Jaina More, PS-Jaridih, District-Bokaro
... ... Opposite Parties
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate For the State : APP
04/24.01.2020 The petitioner has challenged the judgment dated 25.01.2016 passed in M.P. Case No. 22 of 2013 by which he has been directed to pay Rs. 3,000/- per month to his wife and Rs. 2,500/- per month each to his minor children.
By an elaborate judgment running into 23 pages, the learned Family Court Judge has held that the opposite party who is the present petitioner is liable to pay maintenance allowance to his wife and minor children under section 125 Cr. P.C.
Mr. Manish Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this criminal revision petition.
Accordingly, Criminal Revision No. 739 of 2016 is dismissed as withdrawn.
Let a copy of the order be transmitted to the court concerned through FAX.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Tanuj/-
Chetlal Goswami
The State of Jharkhand
Pramila Devi
Anuj Goswami
Jyoti Kumari @ Anu
Shree Chandrashekhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
