The petitioner's application was not pressed at the hearing and was dismissed accordingly without being adjudicated on merits.
Application stands dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B. A. No. 7316 of 2019
Surendra Nayak … … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ---
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
For the Petitioner : Md. Zaid Ahmad, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Soumitra Baroi, A.P.P.
7/07.11.2019 Md. Zaid Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this application at this stage.
Accordingly, this application stands dismissed as not pressed as this stage.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)
R. Shekhar Cp 3
Surendra Nayak
The State of Jharkhand
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court