Single bench order staying coercive action against the petitioner until a future hearing pending exploration of settlement possibilities in a domestic harassment case.
No coercive action to be taken against the petitioner pending future hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No.743 of 2016
Pramod Pandey, S/o Ashok Pandey .....
Petitioner(s)
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Anr. …. Opp. Party(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. D. K. Deo, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Priyadarshi, APP
03/04.05.2016. The petitioner(s), who is accused for offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, pray(s) for anticipatory bail expressing apprehension of his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.473 of 2015.
The complainant/ informant is not other than the wife of the petitioner.
Issue notice to the Opp. Party No.2 through both the processes under registered cover AD as well as under ordinary process for which requisites etc. must be filed within a week.
Call for the lower court records.
List this case on 20th June, 2016.
On that day i.e. 20th June, 2016, petitioner as well as complainant should be present physically in the court so that possibilities of resolution may be explored.
In the meantime, no coercive action shall be taken against the abovenamed petitioner in connection with Complaint Case No.473 of 2015, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Koderma.
Sandeep/
1 issue framed by the court
¿Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused under section 498A IPC in anticipation of arrest?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pramod Pandey
The State of Jharkhand
Anant Bijay Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
