HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA…
Permission to withdraw granted; liberty to challenge rules granted; notice discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
COPC No. 245 of 2012.
Date of Decision: 27th May, 2013.
_________________________________________________________
Satish Aumta ……Petitioner.
Versus
Sh. Ali Raza Rizvi & others …..Respondents.
_______________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, J. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. B.S. Parmar, Addl. A. G. with Mr. Kush Sharma, Dy. A.G. and Mr. Vikram Thakur, Dy. A.G.
Dev Darshan Sud, J. (Oral).
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Permission granted. Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Notice discharged.
( Dev Darshan Sud), Judge
(Dharam Chand Chaudhary) 27th May, 2013. Judge (jai)
1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
Satish Aumta
Ali Raza Rizvi
Dev Darshan Sud
Dharam Chand Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
