Single judge order disposing of a contempt petition. Counsel submitted that respondents complied with prior directions. Court closed the contempt petition on 12.03.2024.
The contempt petition is closed as the respondents have complied with the directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010214862023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/580/2023
SACHINDRA CHOUDHURY
S/O- LATE PRAFULLYA CHOUDHURY, R/O- VILL.- NOMALPUR, P.O. SIDLI, DIST. CHIRANG, ASSAM, PIN- 783373.
VERSUS
BINITA PEGU AND ANR
SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM WPT AND BC AND TRIBAL
AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, ASSAM, D-BLOCK ,GROUND FLOOR, JANATA BHAWAN, DISPUR, GHY-781006.
2:BHAWANI PRASAD SHARMA
DIRECTOR
WPT AND BC (TRIBAL AFFAIRS) ASSAM OFFICE OF THE DIRECTORATE OF TRIBAL AFFAIRS ASSAM SATRINIVASH PATH RUKMINI NAGAR GHY-781006
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B K DAS
Advocate for the Respondent :
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR
ORDER
Date : 12.03.2024
Mr. H. P. Guwala, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondents have complied with the directions passed by this Court.
Accordingly, this contempt petition is closed.
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition is to be allowed for non-compliance or closed.
SACHINDRA CHOUDHURY
BINITA PEGU AND ANR
LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
