The Gauhati High Court closed a contempt petition after hearing counsel. The court noted that the prior order was modified and merged with a subsequent order dated 27.07.2023, rendering no further adjudication necessary.
Contempt petition stands closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010108552023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/326/2023
RAJIB KUMAR DUTTA SON OF LATE RABINDRA KUMAR DUTTA, RESIDENT OF RANGIRKHARI TARANI ROAD, SILCHAR- 788005, DISTRICT- CACHAR, ASSAM.
VERSUS
ROHAN KR JHA and ANR. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SILCHAR, CACHAR.
2:SMTI. SWASTI ROY HEADMISTRESS SILCHAR COLLEGIATE SCHOOL RAM KRISHNA MISSION ROAD SILCHAR-788003 CACHAR SILCHAR
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. P CHAKRABORTY
Advocate for the Respondent : MS. K PHUKAN
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
O R D E R
Page No.# 2/2
11.03.2024.
Heard Ms. P. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. K. Phukan, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 and Mr. P.K. Roy, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. A. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the respondent No.2.
The learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the order dated 31.03.2023, passed in WP(C) No.1375/2023 has been modified and accordingly merged with the subsequent order dated 27.07.2023.
In view of above, the Contempt Petition stands closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
RAJIB KUMAR DUTTA
ROHAN KR JHA
SMTI. SWASTI ROY
KARDAK ETE
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
