Contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a High Court order in WP(C) No.7488/2022. Counsel for respondents submitted the order dated 03.02.2023 had been complied with; the court closed and disposed of the contempt petition.
Contempt petition closed as complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010117052023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/340/2023
PRADIP KUMAR BAISHYA S/O- LATE MANAMOHAN BAISHYA, P.O.- KAKLABARI, MOUZA- KAKLABARI, DISTRICT- BAKSA, PIN- 781330, ASSAM.
VERSUS
DR. BIJOYA CHOUDHURY, I.A.S. AND 2 ORS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, GROUND FLOOR, BLOCK-C, JANATA BHAWAN, DISPUR- 781005.
2:SURANJAN SENAPATI ACS DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM
KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI- 781019.
3:J.P. BRAHMA AES THE DIRECTOR EDUCATION(DE) (BTC)
KOKRAJHAR ASSAM
PIN- 783370
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D S DEKA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR P NAYAK (r-3)
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
O R D E R
11.03.2024.
Heard Mr. D.S. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Also heard Mr. N.J. Khataniar, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 and Mr. S.R. , learned counsel for the respondent No.3, who submits that the order of this Court, passed on 03.02.2023, in WP(C) No.7488/2022 has been complied with.
In view of above, the instant Contempt Petition stands closed and disposed.
The learned counsel for the alleged contemner to furnish a copy of the compliance order to the learned counsel for the petitioner.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Pradip Kumar Baishya
Dr. Bijoya Choudhury, I.A.S.
Suranjan Senapati ACS
J.P. Brahma AES
Kardak Ete
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
