Contempt petition against revenue and district officials was withdrawn as the matter had become infructuous; the High Court closed the contempt petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010201552022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/557/2022
RUPEN BRAHMA
S/O- LATE MADARAM BRAHMA,
R/O- UTTAR PUB GEETANAGAR, PANI PATH, P.O AND P.S- NOONMATI, GUWAHATI, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN-781020
VERSUS
GYANENDRA DEV TRIPATHI AND ANR
COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE (RELIEF AND REHABILITATION BRANCH) AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06
2:PALLAV GOPAL JHA IAS
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF KAMRUP (M) AT GUWAHATI LICHUBAGAN HENGRABARI ASSAM PIN-78103
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R Deka
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA (r-1)
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. SEMA
ORDER
Date : 07-03-2024
Mr. S.I Akand, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous and therefore, he has instruction to withdraw the petition.
The contempt petition is accordingly closed as withdrawn.
Mr. J. Handique, learned counsel appears for the respondent No. 1.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Rupen Brahma
Gyanendra Dev Tripathi
Pallav Gopal Jha IAS
K. Sema
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
