Disposed
Rana Pratap Sarmah v. Rajesh Prasad, IAS and 6 Ors.
Gauhati HCCont.Cas(C)/649/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
GAHC010272922019 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
GAHC010272922019 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010272922019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/649/2019
RANA PRATAP SARMAH
S/O LT. KANDARPESWAR SARMA, R/O FLAT NO. 101, ANUKUL NIWAS, BISHNU PATH, BYE LANE 4, RUKMINIGAON, P.O. KHANAPARA, GUWHATI, DIST. KAMRUP (M)
VERSUS
RAJESH PRASAD, IAS AND 6 ORS.
THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, AGRICULTURE DEPTT. BLOCK-E, FIRST FLOOR, ASSAM, (CIVIL) SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6, ASSAM
2:KUMUD CH. KALITA
THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM AGRICULTURE DEPTT. ROOM NO. C 226 BLOCK C 2ND FLOOR JANATA BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 ASSAM
3:BIJOYA CHOUDHURY THE ADDITIONAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM AGRICULTURE DEPTT. BLOCK C 1ST FLOOR 107 JANATA BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 ASSAM
4:NABIN CH. INGTY
Page No.# 2/3
THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM AGRICULTURE DEPTT. ROOM NO.E- 112 BLOCK E 1ST FLOOR JANATA BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 ASSAM 5:MANOJ KUMAR IAS THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE DEPTT. KHANAPARA GUWAHATI-781022 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 6:PRAKASH RANJAN GHARPHOLIA THE SECRETARY ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION JAWAHARNAGAR KHANAPARA GUWAHATI-781022 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 7:ABDOUR ROUF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI-781029 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S BORTHAKUR
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. B CHOUDHURY, SC, AGRICULTURE DEPTT.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date : 10-03-2023
Mr. S. Borthakur, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of this
Page No.# 3/3
Court has been complied with and therefore, nothing survives in this contempt case.
Mr. B. Choudhury, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 5 is present.
In view of the submission made by Mr. Borthakur, this contempt case stands closed.
JUDGE
GS
Comparing Assistant
Rana Pratap Sarma
Rajesh Prasad, IAS and 6 Ors.
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court