The petitioner sought to close a contempt application. The court accepted the submission that the impugned order had been complied with and closed the application without further remarks.
Application closed on submission of compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010181642021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/423/2021
CHAMIDA KHATUN
W/O LATE MIYAJ ALI, VILL- SARIHAKUCHI, P.O.-GAHIA, P.S.-SARTHEBARI, DIST- BARPETA (ASSAM), PIN-781311
VERSUS
M S MANIVANNAN, IAS AND ANR
THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT, RELIEF AND REHABILITATION DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06
2:TEJ PRASAD BHUSAL ACS THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BARPETA DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN-78131
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. W RAHMAN
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA (R-1)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ORDER
06.08.2022
Page No.# 2/2
Mr. W. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that since the order against which this application has been filed, has been complied with and therefore, the application may be closed.
Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 is present.
In view of the above submission made by Mr. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner, this contempt application is closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
CHAMIDA KHATUN
M S MANIVANNAN, IAS AND ANR
Manish Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
