The Gauhati High Court closed contempt proceedings against the Director of Secondary Education after verification that the prior writ petition judgment was duly complied with by passing an order recommending the case to the State Level Committee.
The contempt proceedings stands closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010101312020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/307/2020
JAMAL UDDIN RAJBARBHUIYA
S/O- LT. AFTAB ALI RAJBARBHUIYA, R/O- VILL- HATIRHAR, P.O. HAZARIGRAM BAZAR, PIN- 788101, P.S. LAKHIPUR, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM
VERSUS
PHANINDRA JIDUNG
DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA, GHY-19
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. JUNM LASKAR
Advocate for the Respondent : MR S M T CHISTIE
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
::ORDER::
Date : 18/04/2022
Heard Mr.J.N.M. Laskar, the learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. S.M. T. Chistie, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent/contemnor.
Mr. S.M.T.Chistie, the learned counsel for the Respondent/Contemnor has placed
Page No.# 2/2
on record an order dated 05.04.2022 whereby the case of the Petitioner has been recommended for placing before the State Level Committee for further decision.
A perusal of the said order would show that the order passed by this Court on 31.07.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 5894/2016 has been duly complied with. Accordingly, the Contempt Proceedings stands closed.
A copy of the order furnished by Mr. S.M.T. Chistie, the learned counsel for the Contemnor is kept on record and marked with the letter “X”.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
JAMAL UDDIN RAJBARBHUIYA
PHANINDRA JIDUNG
DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, ASSAM
DEVASHIS BARUAH
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
