Sri Suman Bhattacharya and Anr. v. Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed an appeal in default due to the non-appearance of the appellant while respondent counsel were present.
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed an appeal in default due to the non-appearance of the appellant while respondent counsel were present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA Appl. No. 100 of 2022
(Arising out of I.A. 1105 of 2021 S.A. 539 of 2018 DRT-III Kolkata) THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
Order No. 24 08.05.2025 1. Suman Bhattacharyya 2. Supriya Bhattacharyya Both resides at 27/1, Joy Krishna Paul Road, PO Sahapur, P.A. New Alipore, Kolkata – 700038. ... Appellant --Vs--
. For Appellant : For Respondent : Mr. Debasish Chakraborty, ld. adv. resp. 1 and 2. Mr. R.S.Tiwari, ld. adv resp. no. 3 to 6 Mr. Anubhav Sinha, ld. adv.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Matter is taken up in the revised list. None appears for the appellant. Learned counsel for the respondent bank as well as learned counsel for respondent no. 3 to 6 are present.
Accordingly, matter is dismissed in default.
File be consigned to record room.
Copy of the order be supplied to the appellant and the respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT. Copy of the judgement/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website.
Order dictated, signed and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 8th day of May, 2025.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava, J) Chairperson
Dated : 08.05.2025 07/pkb
Suman Bhattacharyya
Supriya Bhattacharyya
Indian bank
Dharmindar Kumar Verma
Sudhir Kumar Verma
Smt. Aman Verma
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
17 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court