Sri Suman Bhattacharya and Anr. v. Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
This adjournment order records no substantive decision, disposition, or legal principle. It notes a procedural deferral of the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 100 of 2022
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
| 05.10.2023 | Suman Bhattacharya & Another … Appellants -Vs- Indian Bank & 5 Others … Respondents |
|---|---|
| Mr. Saket Choudhury with |
|
| Ms. Jayshree Saha and |
|
| Ms. Susmita Chakraborty, Learned Counsel for Appellants |
|
| Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti with |
|
| Ms. Sharmistha Pal, Learned Counsel for the Respondents No. 1 and 2/Bank |
|
| Mr. Radhey Shyam Tiwari, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 3 to 6 |
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
On the request of Counsel for Respondent No. 3 to 6 the matter stands adjourned for the day.
List on 29th January, 2024 for disposal of I.A. 293 of 2023 and I.A. 292 of 2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson Dated 05th October, 2023 07/ac
Suman Bhattacharya
Indian Bank
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
17 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court