Sri Suman Bhattacharya and Anr. v. Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Listing order for I.A. 51 of 2022 granting time to appellants for rejoinder. The tribunal listed the matter for subsequent hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 75 of 2022)
(Arising out of S.A. 539 of 2018 in DRT-3, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
15.07.2022 Suman Bhattacharyya & Another … Appellants -VsIndian Bank … Respondents Mr. Nimish Mishra with Ms. Jayasree Saha and Mr. Saket Choudhary, Learned Counsel for Appellants Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti with Ms. Sharmistha Pal, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1
Mr. Anubhav Sinha with Mr. Radhey Shyam Tiwari, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 3 to 6
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Affidavit-in-Opposition filed by Respondents No. 3 to 6; taken on record.
Learned Counsel for Appellants prays for, and is granted, two weeks time to file rejoinder.
List the matter on 2nd August, 2022 for hearing of I.A. 51 of 2022.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 15th July, 2022 02/ac
Suman Bhattacharyya & Another
Indian Bank
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
17 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court