Bank of Baroda v. Taraknath Das
Case brief
What is this about?
Order in appeal. The judgment was reserved on the merits. No provisions were applied in the reported order; no disposition was announced in this text.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl. No. 73 of 2022
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
12.09.2023
Bank of Baroda & Ors.
… Appellants Vs.
Tarak Nath Das & Ors.
….. Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mukherjee, ld. Advocate for bank
For Respondents : Mr. Souritra Ganguly, ld. Advocate for resp. no.1 Ms. Aparna Das, ld. Advocate for resp. no.1 Mr. Rahul Poddar, ld. Advocate for resp. no.2 Mr. A. K. Dhandhania, ld. Senior Advocate for resp. 3 – Ashok Agarwal. Ms. Sweta Mishra, ld. Advocate for resp. no.3. Mr. Soumo Mukherjee, ld. Advocate for resp. no.3. Mr. Akchansh Kishore, ld. Adv. for intervenor
– Mr.Dinesh Ch. Das.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of Baroda & Ors.
- respondent
Tarak Nath Das & Ors.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court