Union Bank of India v. Rajendra Tosawad
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal directed the DRT, Cuttack to decide a specific appeal within ten days. Due to non-compliance, the Tribunal called for an explanation and threatened proceedings against the Registrar.
What did the court decide?
Direction to DRT Cuttack to decide S.A. 50 of 2021 within ten days; Call for explanation from Registrar for non-compliance.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Misc. Appeal Diary No. 587 of 2023 (Arising out of S.A. 50 of 2021 in DRT, Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
12.09.2023 Union Bank of India … Appellant -VsRajendra Tosawad & 3 Others … Respondents Mr. Sandeep Kumar Mishra, representing Mr. Tuna Sahu, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Ms. Nimisha Agarwal, Counsel for Respondent No. 1
Mr. Pratap Chandra Mohapatra with Mr. Sabyasachi Mohapatra, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 2 to 4
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
I have heard the Learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record.
An application is filed with a prayer for expeditious disposal of the matter in S.A. 50 of 2021. It is an undisputed fact that the matter was heard by DRT, Cuttack on 11th July, 2023 but the judgment is yet not delivered.
Counsel for Respondent No. 1 submits that certain I.A.s are also pending.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Union Bank of India
- respondent
Rajendra Tosawad
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Anil Kumar Srivastava
- Order 2 — this page · Anil Kumar Srivastava
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court