This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 26 of 2020
(Arising out of S.A. 37 of 2018 in DRT, Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
18.01.2023 M/s. Hindusthan Agencies … Appellant -VsTarak Nath Das & 4 Others … Respondents
None for Appellant
Ms. Sweta Mishra, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1 Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mukherjee, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 2, 3 and 4/ Bank of Baroda
Mr. Ashok Kumar Dhandhania with Mr. Soumiyo Mukherjee, Learned Counsel for Intervenor/Respondent No. 5
With Appeal No. 73 of 2022
(Arising out of S.A. 37 of 2018 in DRT, Cuttack)
Bank of Baroda … Appellants -VsTarak Nath Das & 2 Others … Respondents
Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mukherjee, Learned Counsel for Appellants/ Bank of Baroda Ms. Sweta Mishra, Learned Counsel for Respondent No.1
None for Respondent No. 2
Mr. Ashok Kumar Dhandhania with Mr. Soumiyo Mukherjee, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 3/Added Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
2
In Appeal No. 26 of 2020
Heard the Learned Counsel for the Appellant at length. Argument could not be concluded.
Opposition filed by Respondents No. 1 and 5 is taken on record. Copy served upon the other side. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within a week.
List both the matters on 14th February, 2023 for hearing.
Copy of the order be retained in the records of Appeal No. 73 of 2022.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 18th January, 2023 08/18/ac
M/s. Hindusthan Agencies
Bank of Baroda
Tarak Nath Das & Others
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
