The Appellate Tribunal, while hearing an appeal, directed the registry to summon records from the Debts Recovery Tribunal at Cuttack immediately and listed the matter for further hearing on 04.09.2023.
Registry directed to summon records from the DRT, Cuttack; list for further hearing on 04.09.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl. No. 73 of 2022
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
23.08.2023
Bank of Baroda
… Appellant Vs.
Taraknath Das
….. Respondent
For Appellant : Mr. Pankaj Kr Mukherjee, ld. Counsel.
For Respondent : Mr. A. K. Dhandhania, ld. Senior Counsel. Ms. Sweta Mishra, ld. Counsel. Mr. Rahul Poddar, ld. Counsel.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Heard learned counsel for both the parties as well as Mr. Akchansh Kishore, ld. Counsel for the intervenor Mr. Dinesh Chandra Das at length.
During the course of hearing, I find that it is necessary to peruse the records of learned DRT below. Registry is directed to summon the records from learned DRT, Cuttack immediately.
List on 04.09.2023 for further hearing.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava, J) Chairperson
Dated : 23.08.2023 12 /pkb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether records from the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Cuttack should be summoned for hearing.
Bank of Baroda
Taraknath Das
Dinesh Chandra Das
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
