Disposed
Manoj Kumar Sharma and 3 Ors. v. Bank of Baroda and 3 Others
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/331/2016
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 47/2021 in Regular Appeal No. 331/2016 Date: 08.05.2023
Present: Shri Alok Rai, counsel for the appellants, Shri Avinash Jaiswal, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the appellant contends that he has received a copy of reply today, therefore, he wants to file rejoinder. Let the same be filed by the next date.
The cause shown in the restoration application is sufficient, therefore, the same is allowed. The appeal be registered to its original number.
The I.A. No. 99/2022 being substitution application for substituting the legal heirs of the appellant no. 3 is pending consideration. Accordingly, the substitution application is allowed. Let the necessary substitution be made by the appellant in the array of parties within 48 hours.
List this case on 22.08.2023.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Anupam
Respondent-Bank
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court