Amit Kumar v. Bank of Baroda and Ors.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 543/2022 Date: 08.05.2023
Present: None for the appellant, Shri G. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Perusal of the earlier order of this Tribunal dated 17.03.2023 shows that none was present on behalf of the appellant on that date.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that the present appeal has become infructuous as entire amount has been deposited by the appellant.
In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Appellant
- respondent
Respondent-Bank
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 091090005432022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court