Order in a miscellaneous application regarding proof of service in Regular Appeal No. 331/2016. Time was granted to file a reply by the respondent-Bank, failing which an order would be passed. Case listed for hearing.
Time granted to file reply; adjourned for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 47/2021 in Regular Appeal No. 331/2016 Date: 23.11.2022
Manoj Kumar Sharma & Ors. Vs. Bank of Baroda & Ors.
Present: Shri Alok Rai, counsel for the appellants, Shri Avinash Jaiswal, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the appellants files proof of publication with regard to the service upon the respondents no. 2, 3 & 4.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that the reply is under preparation, therefore, sometime may be granted.
Time as prayed for is granted to file reply, failing which the appropriate order shall be passed.
List this case on 09.02.2023 for hearing as the application is of year 2021.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Manoj Kumar Sharma & Ors.
Bank of Baroda & Ors.
Justice R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
