ramakrishnaiah muli v. State Bank of India
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl. Dy No. 263 of 2023
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
20.06.2023
Ramakrishnaiah Muli
Appellant
Vs. State Bank of India
For Appellant : Mr. Rahul Das, ld. Counsel. Mr. Kamran Hossain, ld. Adv. Md. Dilawar Khan, ld. Adv.
For Respondent : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mukherjee, ld. Counsel.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Compliance of the order dated 12.05.2023 is not made. Learned counsel for the appellant prays for and is granted two weeks time to file affidavit of service subject to payment of Rupees five thousand as costs to be paid to the State Legal Services authority.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ramakrishnaiah Muli
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · June
- CNR
- 191090002632023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court