Brij Mohan Chopra v. State Bank of India and Ors.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 492/2022 Date: 19.05.2023
Present: Shri Satish Agarwal along with Shri V. K. Shukla, Shri Yashvardhan Agrawal and Shri Aditya Nayak, counsels for the appellant, Shri P. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant on I.A. No. 385/2023 being urgency application, in which it has been stated that the pleadings are complete between the parties and as the auction purchaser has demolished the auctioned property, therefore, it is prayed that the appeal may be preponed and decided at the earliest.
The report of the Registrar dated 17.05.2023 shows that the matter is already fixed for 03.07.2023.
In view of the above, no good ground is made out in the urgency application for expediting the matter. Therefore, the urgency application is liable to be rejected. Accordingly, the same is rejected.
List this case on the date already fixed i.e. 03.07.2023.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Appellant
- respondent
Respondent-Bank
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court