Dismissed
Brij Mohan Chopra v. State Bank of India and Ors.
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Tribunal rejected an application to recall an order fixing time for a pre-deposit. The appellant was directed to deposit 25% of the debt under section 19 of the RDB Act, 1993, as mandatory. The appeal was dismissed as not entertainable for failure to make the deposit. A hearing on waiver of the remaining 25% was fixed contingent on deposit.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed as not entertainable for want of mandatory pre-deposit without further reference to the court.