U C O Bank v. State Bank of India and 3 Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 370/2020 Date: 02.03.2023
UCO Bank Vs. State Bank of India and Ors.
Present: Shri Anuj Mandhyan, Advocate holding brief of Shri Mrinal Lalchandani, counsel for the appellant, Shri Avinash Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent-Bank, None for the respondent no. 4,
The office report dated 01.03.2023 shows that as per tracking report, notice sent to the respondent no. 3 has returned back with endorsement “the addressee could not be located”. Let the steps be taken by the counsel for the appellant within 10 days for service of notice upon the respondent no. 3 by publication in the newspaper having wide circulation in the area. Affidavit along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
Learned counsels appearing for the respondents seek time to file reply. Let the same be filed by the next date.
List this case on 24.05.2023 for waiver.
Anupam
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
UCO Bank
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court