Bank of Baroda v. Mrs Anita Agarwal
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant argued that the deposit directed by the Tribunal was meager. The court directed the Tribunal to abide by the SARFAESI Act and section 27 of the RDB Act while passing further orders and disposed of the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Appeal disposed; Tribunal directed to abide by SARFAESI Act and RDB Act, Section 27 in pending sale application.
What the court decided
Appeal Dy. No. 248/2023 Date: 02.03.2023
Bank of Baroda Vs. Mrs. Anita Agarwal
Present: Shri P. K. Srivastava, counsel for the appellant,
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the total dues against the appellant is about Rs. 55.00 lacs, but the Tribunal below vide order impugned has directed the S.A. applicants to deposit Rs. 1.00 lac within two days and the remaining amount in installments as indicated in the said order. It is further argued that against the outstanding dues, the amount, which is directed to be deposited by the borrowers, is a very meager amount. In this regard, the learned counsel has referred to section 27 of the RDB Act. 1993. Learned counsel for the appellant also submits that the securitization application pending before the Tribunal below is fixed tomorrow i.e. 03.03.2023 for hearing, therefore, the appeal may be taken up today on mention.
In view of the above, the case has been taken up today.
After hearing the learned counsel for the appellant, there is no doubt that the Tribunal below shall abide by the provision of SARFAESI Act, 2002 and section 27 of the RDB Act, 1993 while passing further orders in the pending S.A. Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed off.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Tribunal below abiding by the provision of SARFAESI Act and section 27 of the RDB Act, 1993 in pending S.A.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of Baroda
- respondent
Mrs. Anita Agarwal
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 091090002482023
- Topic
- Specific Performance
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Rajesh Dayal Khare
- Order 2 · LD Registrar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court