U C O Bank v. State Bank of India and 3 Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 370/2020 Date: 21.12.2023
UCO Bank Vs. State Bank of India and Anr.
Present: Shri Anuj Mandhyan, Advocate holding brief of Shri Mrinal Lalchandani, counsel for the appellant, Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent-Bank, None for the other respondents,
The office report dated 20.12.2023 shows that no steps have been taken by the counsel for the appellant for service of notice upon the respondent nos. 3 through paper publication pursuant to the earlier order dated 02.03.2023. The said report further records that the respondent no. 2 is not appearing inspite of paper publication. The respondent no. 4 has appeared through his counsel Shri V.K.S. Somwanshi.
Let the served respondents put in appearance and file reply by the next date, if so desired.
Learned counsel for the appellant may take fresh steps for service of notice upon the respondent no. 3 within a week by paper publication, failing which appropriate order shall be passed. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
List this case on 02.04.2024 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
UCO Bank
- respondent
State Bank of India
- respondent
Respondent no. 3
- respondent
Respondent no. 4
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 091090003702020
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court