Dinesh Kumar Tiwari v. Bank of Baroda and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge granted the Bank time to file a reply. Directed the Appellant to serve notice on the second respondent via newspaper publication due to insufficient address. Listed for further service proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Direction to Appellant to serve notice by newspaper publication within 10 days. Case listed for 19.05.2023.
What the court decided
Appeal Dy. No. 1036/2022 Date: 01.03.2023
Dinesh Kumar Tiwari Vs. Bank of Baroda
Present: Shri Ashok Pandey, counsel for the appellant, Shri Sandeep Arora, Advocate holding brief of Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the respondent-bank seeks time to file reply.
The office report dated 28.02.2023 shows that the notice sent to the respondent no. 2 has returned back with endorsement “insufficient address”. Let the appellant take fresh steps within 10 days for service of notice upon the respondent no. 2 by publication in the newspaper having wide circulation in the area. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
List this case on 19.05.2023 for service. Till then the interim order, if any, shall remain operative.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dinesh Kumar Tiwari
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 091090010362022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court