The High Court listed the appeal on adjournment due to the personal unavailability of the lead counsel for the appellants.
Listed on 23.08.2022 for hearing following an adjournment application due to counsel's absence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 208/2019 In Regular Appeal No. 85/2014 Date: 28.04.2022
Vikash Kohli and Ors. Vs. Union Bank of India
Present: Shri Tejas Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, counsel for the appellants, Shri Kushal Kant, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the arguing counsel Shri A. K. Singh could not come on account of some personal reason, therefore, he prays for adjournment.
As prayed, list this case on 23.08.2022 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Vikash Kohli and Ors.
Union Bank of India
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
