Disposed
Shri Om Prakash Tiwari and Anr. v. Union Bank of India Anr.
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/106/2016
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 106/2016 Date: 27.04.2022
Shri Om Prakash Tiwari & Anr. Vs. Union Bank of India
Present: Shri K. Kartikey, counsel for the appellant, Shri Rakesh Mishra, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri M. S. Rathore, counsel for the respondent
Learned counsel for the appellant files vakalatnama along with substitution application being I.A. No. 63/2022 today in the court and submits that on account of pendency of special appeal no. 2299 of 2018, the matter could not be heard. Now it is stated that the SLP has been decided by the Hon’ble Apex court vide order dated 28.01.2022, therefore, the matter be heard.
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the respondent no. 2 auction purchaser has died and substitution application has been filed.
The substitution application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased respondent no. 2 be substituted within 48 hours.
List this case on 08.08.2022. Till then the interim order, if any, shall remain operative.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Om Prakash Tiwari & Anr.
Union Bank of India
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court