Arun Goenka v. Smt Suman Rai and Others
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 215/2017 Date: 28.04.2022
Arun Goenka Vs. Smt. Suman Rai & Ors.
Present: Shri Mayank Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Shri Gulab Anand, counsel for the appellants, Shri Rakesh Mishra, counsel for the respondents no. 1 & 2, Shri S. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondent no. 3–Bank ,
The office report dated 27.04.2022 shows that no proof of publication with regard to the service upon the respondent nos. 4 & 5 has been filed nor any reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3. The report further shows that the waiver, amendment and delay condonation applications are pending consideration.
Let the proof of publication for the respondents no. 4 & 5 be filed by the next date.
Learned counsels for the appearing respondents states that copy of the memo of appeal has not been served upon them. Therefore, learned counsel for the appellant is directed to serve a copy of memo upon the appearing counsels for the respondents during course of the day. Let the respondents file reply by the next date.
List this case on 23.08.2022 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Arun Goenka
- respondent
Smt. Suman Rai
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court