Disposed
Manoranjan Prasad v. Punjab National Bank and 2 Ors.
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/136/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court listed the regular appeal for the filing of the reply on 17.08.2022.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 136/2018 Date: 27.04.2022
Manoranjan Prasad Vs. Punjab National Bank & Ors.
Present: Shri K. Kartikey, counsel for the appellant, Shri S. K. Gupta, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sunil Kumar Srivastava, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Shri K. Kartikey, Advocate files vakalatnama today on behalf of the appellant, which is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that the arguing counsel Shri S. K. Srivastava is indisposed, therefore, he is unable to come today, hence prays for adjournment.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter is being adjourned time and again, whereas the appeal pertains to the year 2018 and no reply has been filed by the respondentBank till date.
As last opportunity, the time is granted to the respondents to file reply, failing which appropriate order shall be passed.
List this case on 17.08.2022 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Manoranjan Prasad
Punjab National Bank
Justice R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court