No summary possible. The text consists solely of an order to adjourn the regular appeal to a later date for waiver of argument due to counsel's unavailability.
Case listed on 21.07.2022 for waiver.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 266/2016 Date: 06.04.2022
Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd. Vs. Bank of Baroda and Ors.
Present: Shri Himanshu Tiwari, Advocate holding brief of Shri Rakesh Mishra, counsel for the appellant, Shri Ajal Krishna, counsel for the respondent-Bank, None for the other respondents,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the arguing counsel Shri Rakesh Mishra could not come due to some personal work, hence, the case be adjourned.
As requested, list this case on 21.07.2022 for waiver.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd.
Bank of Baroda
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
