Disposed
Chhatisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd. v. Bank of Baroda and Ors.
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/266/2016
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 266/2016 Date: 15.11.2022
Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd. Vs. Bank of Baroda and Ors.
Present: Shri Rakesh Mishra, counsel for the appellant, Shri Sekhar Chandra, Advocate holding brief of Shri Ajal Krishna, counsel for the respondent-Bank, None for the other respondents,
Learned counsel for the appellant contends that he has filed rejoinder to the reply of the waiver application today in the court after serving copy of the same to the counsel for the respondent-Bank.
Learned counsel for the appellant contends that after bifurcation of the State of Madhya Pradesh, 20% liability was of the State of Chhattisgarh, which was amounting to Rs. 20.96 crores, out of which the appellant has also deposited Rs. 24.73 crores.
Learned counsel for the respondent-bank submits that rejoinder has been given today, therefore, the matter may be adjourned so that he may prepare the case.
List this case on 05.01.2023.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd.
Bank of Baroda
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court