Dismissed
Arun Goenka v. Smt Suman Rai and Others
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/215/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable because the appellant failed to comply with an order requiring a 25% pre-deposit of the due amount. Consequently, the appeal was treated as dismissed for non-mandatory pre-deposit without further reference.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is treated dismissed as not maintainable for non-compliance of the mandatory pre-deposit order.