Sri Palakurthi Nikesh Kumar v. Indian Bank
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 672 of 2022
(Arising out of S.A. 175 of 2020 in DRT-II, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
| 21.12.2022 | Palakurt | hi Nikes | h Kumar |
|---|---|---|---|
| … Appellant | |||
| -Vs- | |||
| Indian | Bank | & 2 Others |
|
| … Respondents |
Ms. Suparna Biswas, Learned Counsel for the Appellant
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
For Admission
Appellant has filed two applications; I.A. 450 of 2022 for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and I.A. 451 of 2022 for waiver from making pre deposit.
Issue notice upon the Respondents and file Affidavit-ofservice within one week.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Palakurti Nikes Kumar
- respondent
Indian Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 191090006722022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court