A regular appeal regarding an application for release of amount by Allahabad Bank. The court noted the absence of the appellant's arguing counsel granted an adjournment and directed the respondent to file an office report.
Adjournment granted; directed respondent to file office report by next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 45/2021 In Regular Appeal No. 12/2019 Date: 11.03.2022
M/s Unicon Technologies and Ors. Vs. Allahabad Bank and Ors.
Present: Shri Anirudh Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Shri D. N. Awasthi, counsel for the appellants, None for the respondents,
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the arguing counsel Shri D. N. Awasthi is out of station, therefore, he prays for adjournment.
The office report dated 10.03.2022 shows that no reply has been filed by the respondent-Bank in response to the application for release of amount. Let the same be filed by the next date.
List this case on 05.07.2022 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Unicon Technologies and Ors.
Allahabad Bank and Ors.
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
