Syndicate Bank v. Safat Hussain and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular Appeal No. 63/2019 adjourned to 07/07/2022 due to personal difficulty of the arguing counsel for the respondents.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 63/2019 Date: 10.03.2022
Syndicate Bank Vs. Safat Hussain and Ors.
Present: Shri Brijesh Kumar Kesharwani, counsel for the appellant, Shri Rajeev Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Shri Swayambhoo Chandranshul, counsel for the respondents,
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the arguing counsel Shri Chandranshul comes from Lucknow and on account of some personal difficulty, he is unable to attend the court today, therefore, seeks adjournment.
As prayed, the case is adjourned to 07.07.2022 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Syndicate Bank
- respondent
Safat Hussain
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court